The Doctrine is the everlasting one

Don Ricardo writes, to the dictation, undoubtedly, of Moscow, a vitriolic entry, with his style, that I have to admit that I like, deeply provocative. An entry, in which it puts to broth every God, very guessed right expression in this case, going so far as to affirm that I respect not neither to the religion, nor to God, nor to the believers, nor to his beliefs, and much less to the Holy Mother Church and to his odious prelates. Not that to say has, and that Don Ricardo and I agree it is much more normal than some unscrupulous one believes, that I share c for b the arguments expressed in this entry, however much I keep on being, because they, and I do not know exactly who it is they who are but I believe that we understand each other, this way they want it, officially member of the Roman Apostolic Catholic Church. I have already expressed in more than one occasion, and with enormous respect towards the one who should have done it, that I do not think to lose not even only one second in dismissing me, of apostatizing, or as it should be called. If they want to deceive themselves it is a problem exclusively his, his and of a government, in this pathetic case I govern, that it allows to deceive itself, knowing perfectly that it is being cheated, with a few unreal numbers of followers who serve to him as alibi to finance with generous length to a religion that I doubt very much that 10 % of the population goes so far as to practise, because 10 % of the population would mean that every Sunday there is, approximately four millions of Spanish who come to mass. Not jarto soup. But it is not of this topic about what I wanted to speak, or better to write because if I limit myself to speaking those who read to me they might not read anything because he would have written anything. Of what I wanted to write, and it is of what I am going to write, it is of the surprise that it produces to me that the words of the new bishop of San Sebastian, referring to the drama of Haiti, have produced scandal when they do not do but to repeat the doctrine of the Church for more than two thousand years: this life, which does not stop being a tears vale, is an antechamber, a transit, towards a more important life, more important pardon, the only important, the eternal life. The Christianity, from the Dad to César what belongs to César to, even more significant happy the mattresses, contains a deeply reactionary philosophy. It is the host! it raises to positive quality the docility, a quality so important that it will allow to possess the ground, but: eye! let's not be wrong, there is not ground that the peasant waters with his perspiration and works with his hands, as he sings the popular popular folk song, but the "engaged ground" that is to say the sky. From here, which it feeds us after her having worked, it can keep on belonging to the owner, that if perhaps, but he repents of his sins and for that one of the camel and the eye of the needle, it can, although the evolution of the Christian official thought is going to be offering him multiple ways out, be condemned. Is there sample more machismo reclacitrante irredento that the treatment that the mesias, the teacher gives to the adulterous woman? True it is that he asks for the cessation of the stone beating, but not for recognizing the right of the woman to go to bed with whom him of the desire, but because the one that is free of sin that throws the first stone. That nobody is wrong, for a Marxist, who has in the historical materialism one of his principal instruments of analysis, the Christianity, which served to carry the transition out from a society esclavista to the feudalism, despite his reactionary morality, he supposed a social progress. But already from ends of the Roman Empire and the high Middle Age, when it turns into the official religion, and until our days, the catholic Christianity turns into the crucible in which the most reactionary melts everything, and without to deny the role that should have the Christianity reformed by Lutero in the ascent of the bourgeoisie to the detriment of the feudal nobility, the diverse branches of the Christianity they have occurred in the same way reactionary, as in the fund diehards are, the religion is the opium of the peoples, each and everyone of the religions that have been marking the history of the humanity out, and much especially the monotheists. There have been very well-intentioned attempts of council religion, fundamentally the catholic, and progress or revolution. They all have failed, from Camilo Torres the Colombian priest who ended up by changing the cassock into the rifle into the lines of the ELN, up to the very estimable and admirable attempts of persons of the nobility of Ignacio Ellacuría, Ignacio Martín Baró, Segundo Montes, Juan Ramón Moreno and Joaquín López, vilely murdered or Jon Sobrino, who was saved from miracle. All of them, following, fundamentally, Leonardo Boff, gave body to the Theology of the Liberation, a movement that reached, and I do not know if it keeps on supporting, a gained good prestige for his commitment with the poor, the deprived ones and the oppressed ones, but that the placet of the hierarchy ever received. And it did not receive it because it was impossible, because this search, for me legitimate, of the liberation in this ground in which we live, we eat, work and reproduce, it is to a great extent, but it performs absolute, incompatible form with this message of exaltation of the docility that impregnates the speech of the Galilean assumption. From the Christianity, Catholic or not, can be a feasible being a few excellent persons, and in fact the majority I am sure that they are, lover of his neighbor and practitioners of the biggest of the charities, but this personal action, that it can become admirabílisima little has to do with the liberation of class to which we aspire the Marxists, from our perspective of revolutionary struggle. Excessive reasons it had, from his ideological optics, the archirreaccionario Karol Wojtyla when the minister annoyed to, then, sandinista Ernesto Cardenal. The bishop Munilla does not say, then, anything especially escandalizante when, from the theological point of view, he feels more worried and hurt for the gradual desreligionación (the swearword does not seem very lucky) of the Spanish society, who every time they pays less attention, except for acts merely social like baptisms, communions, weddings and funerals, because it bears the eternal condemnation, which for the hundreds of thousands of Haitian dead persons, who, perhaps, although the majority practice of the voodoo does not augur anything good, gain access to the eternal life. And I am sure that the bishop Munilla has felt the same compassion that we have felt the others, because he is a human being as we it are all, when he has contemplated the images of the drama. What happens is that it has contributed one more than orthodox vision, from the Christian optics, removing importance to the sufferings of this world to highlight the pleasure of the eternal life. A life that for the Marxists is científicamente, not improbably, but straight impossibly. To me, certainly, they have not scandalized me, the declarations of this bishop so, on the other hand, controversial, I nor am scandalized by the official position of the Roman Church on the abortion, the divorce, the homosexuals or the role, and the rights, of the woman. They are those that they have always supported, and they will support. They are innate with his vision of the world, there they, with this speech, and although they do not erase us of his files and records, every time they have less followers and even less clients for his elegant ritual paraphernalia (it is necessary to admit that a good catholic wedding with music, children with pledge and the whole pyx has his attraction).
Truly escandalizante the fact is that they try, and manage, to impose his points of view on us seeking protection in a social presence that they cannot even demonstrate.
And it is more escandalizante that they are supported and feed with the money of all.
And it produces shakes that this government, which president, soon goes to go to pray with the incarnation Obama, bends, systematically to the requirements of so minority sector of the society.
And it moves to hilarity that the same government appears, to eyes of some, like the champion of the laicism.