Thursday, March 18, 2010

The PP of Alpedrete


Since I initiated, soon it will do three years, this experience of writing with fortitude of that what I think, without intention of convincing or of indoctrinating, should come to others, and especially since I redeem the councilman's charge I have tried, do not know if I have managed, desdramatizar my relations with the People's Party putting him to, clearly and native, discrepancy the sense of humor drops that I have been able. In this context, in multiple occasions, I have called Mrs Maria de la Soledad Casado alcalda, instead of mayoress, trying to allude to his irrefenable, almost compulsive, tendency to commit abuses of authority, which has made him backfire in some occasions, the affirmation is still in the memory of the alpedreteños, without moving a muscle of the face, of which he was thinking to put to the sports center the name of Rafael Nadal, with the argument that it was a question of a big sportsman: person from Madrid!?! as if it happened, to the persons from Madrid, what is said happens with those of Bilbao capable of being born there where they want, which made possible that Our mister Jesus Christ, clear person from Bilbao, was born in Bethlehem. For this type of questions, of backfires I have nicknamed it, in some moment and always with respect, The petarda. This distended tone, it could have given the sensation that my relations with the popular alpedreteños it was excellent, in the personal area it is understood. Without having this excellence, and although missis mayoress has expelled me from a plenary meeting, I have been hardly criticized on his official page, after having to bear his awful education answering our questions with guttural monosyllables, and they even put themselves in a backs plenary meeting while I was intervening, because I satiate of bearing the unbearable interventions at the end of every point, without right to reply, of missis mayoress, in one of them, in an obvious and provocative way I started reading the newspaper, and the relations were not excellent, finally, and I always refer to those of personal nature, they were, at least, polite and polite. Even in some public intervention I have gone so far as to congratulate myself, everyone can deduce with that grade of irony and sarcasm, for the fact that "The PP of my people is not in any town-planning plot", congratulation that was serving to me to reveal, his clear uselessness and incompetence.
The last announced events, of form, which wanted, I do not know if successfully, subtle in a parable published in this binnacle, they are going to change, necessary, this situation, and although I would like that at least the education was persisting, and it will not be me who loses it, difficult times approach. The facts have been reported in the press conference summoned yesterday, with the presence and support of the direction in the person of the partner Carmen Villares and complete account happens in our portal, the local press does echo to itself, even the one that is usually less critical with the management of the PP. And, since they have no arguments, because the facts are those who are, what they have done is, as the small children do, atufarse, to get angry, to fill with false indignation, and to threaten us with the courts. There, if they want, we wait for them, we are calm. Because politically we have defeated them, because they have to explain like someone, and precisely the one who today is a councilman of town planning, who today defends the PGOU of Alpedrete, knew, six months before it was beginning the process that his property would finish re-qualified. Will it be able to keep on defending the kindness of a Plan that to the one who more is of benefit is to him and to his environment? Very much I am afraid that yes because there is the one who can go so far as to harden his face up to unsuspected limits. We are going to spend hard times, know that we are going to be pressed and threatened. Yesterday we said and it is a strong bet:
Last December 30 an agreement was signed between a construction firm and the Town hall of Alpedrete in order to detail a sector affected by the PGOU known as “The Plains”. The target of this agreement is the construction of an important number of housings in this sector on the part of this property development company, once approved definitely the PGOU and in the minor possible period of time.
Between the papers contributed by the property development company there are included contracts of buy and of call option on the part of this company of the farms affected in future PGOU, which is still still to be approved definitely. In the relation of titular persons of these areas that have turned out to be benefited by these contracts there appears the current councilman of town planning of Alpedrete. In other words, this person has already turned out to be benefited economically by the development of this PGOU and that that still has not been approved. There escapes from nobody now which has been the real motivation by which it was included in the electoral list of the People's Party to the last municipal elections. It was never a political motivation, it was simple and smoothly a personal economic reason.
We ask, for obvious motives, the immediate resignation of the councilman of town planning, which we suspect has used his charge to promote a beneficial PGOU for his particular interests. His situation is ethically untenable inside the team of government.
But the most serious of this matter is that this contract of “call option“ between the parts, of which an important payment has already been carried out on the part of this company to the mister councilman, took place on July 1, 2005, six months before the public exhibition of the PGOU, on December 23, 2005.
The proper contract alludes to the PGOU that was, in these dates, beginning appearing for the team editor and the team of government of Marisol Casado. The question to which the mayoress has to answer is: how did the construction firm know what areas were going to be included in the advance of this PGOU?.
Married Marisol: How did the company know that these areas were going to be re-qualified by a PGOU 6 months before being exhibited publicly? Not even the coincidence has capacity in the answer because in several occasions and inside the contract one always alludes to the development of the PGOU.
The Mayoress and the councilman of town planning have always defended this PGOU with fingernails and teeth with the argument that it was necessary for the municipality, which was beneficial for the development of the people Y MÁS LEJOS DE REALITY. They have cheated the neighbors with a farce that is not already supported and for that reason also we ask that the resignation of the Mayoress of Alpedrete that since we all know in 2005 was governing the destinations of our municipality. She is responsible for the current situation of founded suspicion that relapses on the Town hall into reference to this one more than cloudy matter.
As soon as possible, and since we have asked repeatedly the latter years, we demand that this General Plan should move back and that it should be adapted to the real needs for the municipality and his neighbors, not to the personal needs for few ones.
Finally we call also to the political forces that still believe in the real needs of Alpedrete and that are opposite to using the politics as a tool for personal benefit to denounce this deplorable situation, as well as to the local associations of the municipality and to the neighbors in general.
Our neighbors wish a transparent management, not performances cloudy and full of questions that only they lead to question once again the municipal political activity. And they go already too much in our Community of Madrid.
Confíamos, I trust, in the IUCM support, until now we have no complaint. And I trust in your support, the support of those that, from the agreement or the discrepancy, you read the things that this humble applicant writes to Bolshevik's beginner: What would Pavel Korchaguin do in these circumstances? Better I do not appear it. Or yes?

No comments:

Post a Comment